The Art of the Business

A blog dedicated to artists who are serious about their business.

Square pegs in round holes November 30, 2009

I went to see a play last week, and had a very interesting experience, which I both wanted to share with you, and hear your opinion on.

I do publicity for the production company of Capilano University’s theatre department, Exit 22. They do four shows a year, two smaller, and two mainstage. Their most recent production was Romeo + Juliet, which just closed this past Saturday.

I thought the show was quite well done–I often think/talk/blog about how we are going to create a new generation of

Photo Credit: Damon Calderwood

theatre-goers, and this show fit that bill quite nicely. It bridged the original Shakespearean text with segments of the actors talking about the play. The actors were what they were–young–and how to address the problem of producing a play that requires older actors when you have none was one of the challenges that they met head-on. It was also sexier and more violent than a lot of Shakespeare I’ve seen. In other words, this was a play by young people, for young people.

The day I went to see it was a weekday matinee, that was mostly populated by high school students. It was a very interesting experience. The students wanted to know if they could take pictures, or video, and when they couldn’t, amused themselves by taking pictures of themselves and their friends at intermission. And they were a little noisy. This, personally, didn’t bother me, but what did concern me was that a critic was in the audience. At one point, he actually got up and shushed them. And his review was more about the noise than the play.

So here’s my question to you: are we trying to put square pegs into round holes? The tradition of theatre is that of a sacred space–and in that space, silence is demanded. For the sake of the performers, and for the sake of fellow audience members. While I do think that it’s important to show respect for others in the audience, I wonder if we are mistaking engagement for rudeness. Is it possible that the audience was engaged in the show, and that their chatting was actually them comparing notes and sharing information about what was going on?

We were watching this piece of theatre that made every effort to meet this audience where they were–their music, their dancing, their footwear. And yet, that audience wasn’t allowed to react to it in a way that they were used to.

Maybe we should have a section of the audience for teen-agers, away from the rest of the crowd. So they can text and twitter and chat without bothering anyone. Maybe we should open up the sacred space, and make it a bit more accessible.

The question I’m asking is this: if young people are the audience of our future, do we need to:

  • train them on proper “theatre etiquette”, and risk losing them because they’ll consider it to be too boring or stuffy?
  • create theatre that is so compelling that they are totally absorbed and engaged?
  • or allow them to do what they are going to do, and look at it as something positive, rather than negative?

I’m really interested to hear what you have to say.

To view some videos (a tool that we are using extensively with Exit 22) of Romeo + Juliet, visit their YouTube Channel.

add to del.icio.us : Add to Blinkslist : add to furl : Digg it : add to ma.gnolia : Stumble It! : add to simpy : seed the vine : : : TailRank : post to facebook

Advertisements
 

Ten seconds with David French January 14, 2009

Filed under: interview,Local Shows — Rebecca Coleman @ 2:15 am
Tags: , , , , ,

The summer I turned 13, my parents and I, and my older brother Stan, moved from the heart of Kitsilano, on the edge of UBC’s Endowment Lands, to Frenchman’s Cove, Newfoundland. Population: 200.

I spent my formative teenage years growing up the Maritimes, and I can’t even begin to tell  you what an impact it had on my adult life. I will say this: I know that my deep and abiding love of the arts was a seed planted in Newfoundland soil.

Because it is an island, it has withstood outside influences longer than other places in Canada, and the culture is more preserved there. There is a tradition of songs and storytelling that goes very deep.

I have two favorite plays by Newfoundland playwrights: the first is A Rope Against the Sun by Al Pittman, and the second is Salt Water Moon by David French.

I was, as you can imagine, quite thrilled when I got the job of doing publicity for an upcoming production of French’s 1949 at Capilano University. The play follows the Mercer family (we meet Jacob and Mary and their young love in Salt Water Moon) who have married, had children, and moved to Toronto. They struggle with feelings of belonging and displacement the eve of Newfoundland joining confederation.

We emailed Mr. French’s agent, and asked if we could ask him a few questions, and he said yes.david_french

TAoTB: Give your impressions on the state of Canadian playwriting?
DF: I’ve seen many excellent Canadian plays, and I’ve also seen plays that I wish I hadn’t seen. Theatre is a constant invalid, but sometimes he hops out of bed and runs around.

TAoTB: What’s next for David French?
DF: I’m working on two new plays and a novel.

TAoTB: Your plays about the Mercer family are produced all over the world. What is the appeal of a play about a family from a small Newfoundland outport that is so universal?
DF: It deals with our common humanity.

TAoTB: Do you sometimes miss Newfoundland? And long to move back?
DF: No. For years now, it’s existed in my imagination.

TAoTB: What is your favorite production of your work you’ve ever seen?
DF: That’s a tough question. Several are special to me, including the original production of Leaving Home at the Tarragon Theatre back in 1972, the production of Salt-Water Moon at the Saidye Bronfman Theatre in Montreal, and, during the last few years, the revival of those two plays at Soulpepper was outstanding.

For more information on David French, visit his website.

For more information on the upcoming production of 1949, please click here.

Special thanks to the director of 1949, Colin Legge, who supplied some of the questions.

add to del.icio.us : Add to Blinkslist : add to furl : Digg it : add to ma.gnolia : Stumble It! : add to simpy : seed the vine : : : TailRank : post to facebook